TL;DR: In brief
The Amarna royal family as proposed by the 2010 DNA study (Hawass et al., JAMA) and the scholarly interpretations adopted by The Amarna Mysteries series. This tree shows the biological relationships the evidence supports, not the public genealogy the Egyptian court operated within.
Three generations of pharaonic ambition are compressed into a few turbulent decades of Egypt’s 18th Dynasty. The 2010 genetic study of the Amarna royal mummies offered answers to some questions that had been debated for a century — and opened others that remain unresolved. This page lays out the family connections as the series interprets them, with annotations that distinguish the relationships the 2010 DNA study reported from the scholarly choices made to resolve genuine ambiguities in the record.
Where the DNA speaks clearly, so does this tree. Where the DNA identifies a relationship but the named identity is disputed — most notably the KV55 male, Tutankhamun’s biological father — the series adopts the minority reading argued by Aidan Dodson and others: that the skeletal evidence places the KV55 individual too young to be Akhenaten, leaving his brother Smenkhkare as the most likely identification. The series also adopts a further interpretive choice about Pharaoh Neferneferuaten that is discussed in the Who Was Neferneferuaten? essay.
Dashed borders mark cards where the identification is a series-canon interpretive choice, not an archaeological consensus. Solid borders mark consensus positions.
Tiye’s parents Yuya and Thuya are buried in KV46. The 2010 DNA study identifies Tiye (the “Elder Lady” from KV35) as their daughter.
The 2010 DNA study identifies Tutankhamun’s parents as full siblings, both children of Amenhotep III and Tiye; Marc Gabolde’s cousin-marriages alternative, which Dodson takes up, is discussed in Who Was Neferneferuaten?. The KV55 male (the father) has been claimed for both Akhenaten and Smenkhkare; the series follows the skeletal-age evidence pointing to Smenkhkare. The Younger Lady’s name is not attested; the series identifies her as Pharaoh Neferneferuaten.
Akhenaten’s Household
Nefertiti’s royal birth is unattested; she holds no “King’s Daughter” title anywhere in the record. Tey’s title as her nurse suggests she was raised in the household of Ay and his wife Tey. Her unprecedented prominence during Akhenaten’s reign is beyond dispute; whether she ruled beside him is debated, and in the series she never rules as pharaoh.
Akhenaten and Nefertiti had six attested daughters and no attested son.
The Line of Tutankhamun
Full-sibling marriage was a reserved privilege of the Egyptian royal house. On the standard reading of the 2010 DNA study, Tut’s parents were full siblings; the identification of specific individuals is where the series’ interpretive choices come in. Smenkhkare’s marriage to Akhenaten’s daughter Meritaten (shown above) was, in the series, the political union of the co-regency; his child with the Younger Lady, his full sister, was the biological line that produced Tutankhamun.
The 2010 DNA study found that the two fetal mummies from Tutankhamun’s tomb “can be” his daughters. Ankhesenamun’s identification as their mother is tentative, based on partial DNA from KV21A.
The Regent’s Household
Scholars disagree about Nefertiti’s relationship to Ay. The majority view identifies him as her father, and Dodson takes him as most probably so, with Iuy, in his reconstruction, as a deceased first wife and Tey as a stepmother whose “Nurse” title reflects that role. The series instead makes its own choice: Ay was Nefertiti’s uncle, brother of a father who died young. Since that father was another son of Yuya — Tiye’s brother — Nefertiti and Akhenaten were maternal first cousins. Tey’s title “Nurse of the Great Royal Wife” is usually read as ruling her out as Nefertiti’s biological mother, though some have taken Ay and Tey for her parents; in the series she raised Nefertiti but did not bear her.
Nakhtmin’s relationship to Ay is also debated. The majority view, argued by Dodson, reads the title “King’s Son” (sā-nsw) as literal paternity: Nakhtmin was Ay’s son and chosen successor. A minority reading, advanced by van Dijk (1996), holds that the title is honorific and that Nakhtmin’s mother was the Songstress Iwj (or Iuy) of Akhmim, his biological father unrecorded. Either way, as Kawai (2010) stresses, the title marked Nakhtmin as Ay’s designated heir, positioned to block Horemheb. The series adopts Dodson’s genealogy, taking Nakhtmin as Ay’s blood son. (See the Horemheb essay.)
Reading the Tree
Gold cards mark the royal house — descendants of Amenhotep III and Queen Tiye.
Lapis cards mark non-royal households who entered the court by marriage or service.
Carnelian cards mark Tutankhamun and his direct issue.
Dashed borders mark series-canon interpretive choices that go beyond archaeological consensus.
m. denotes marriage. Vertical arrows denote descent.
Related Articles
- Who was Neferneferuaten? — the DNA evidence and the scholarly debate over the female pharaoh between Akhenaten and Tutankhamun
- The royal women of Amarna — Tiye, Nefertiti, the Amarna daughters, and the women whose agency the record preserves or conceals
- The Amarna succession and its aftermath — how the line of Amenhotep III came to an end
- Evidence and power — the forensic and documentary record Nefertiti works with in the novels
See also the three pillar pages: The Amarna Period, The Series, Methodology.
Further Reading
Belmonte, J.A., DNA, wine and eclipses, the Dahamunzu affaire (2013)
Dodson, A., Amarna Sunset: Nefertiti, Tutankhamun, Ay, Horemheb, and the Egyptian Counter-Reformation (2009)
Dodson, A., Nefertiti, Queen and Pharaoh of Egypt: Her Life and Afterlife (2020)
Gabolde, M., L’ADN de la famille royale amarnienne et les sources égyptiennes (2013)
Hawass, Z. et al., Ancestry and Pathology in King Tutankhamun’s Family (2010)
Huber, M.T., Who Was the Father of Tutankhamun? (2016)
Huber, M.T., Horemheb — The Saviour of Ancient Egypt and Founder of the 19th Dynasty (2025)
Kawai, N., Ay Versus Horemheb (2010)
van Dijk, J., Horemheb and the Struggle for the Throne of Tutankhamun (1996)

A.J. Tilke is the author of The Amarna Mysteries, a four-book historical fiction series set in ancient Egypt’s 18th Dynasty. The Poisoner’s Throne (Book 1) is planned for the fourth quarter of 2026, followed by The Restoration Trilogy — The Hittite Reckoning, The Restoration Murders, and The Dakhamunzu Affair — in the second quarter of 2027. A short-story anthology, The Twelve Hours of Night, will follow later.